1 /*
   2  * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
   3  *
   4  * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
   5  * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
   6  * published by the Free Software Foundation.  Oracle designates this
   7  * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided
   8  * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code.
   9  *
  10  * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
  11  * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
  12  * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
  13  * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
  14  * accompanied this code).
  15  *
  16  * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
  17  * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
  18  * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
  19  *
  20  * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
  21  * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
  22  * questions.
  23  */
  24 
  25 /*
  26  * This file is available under and governed by the GNU General Public
  27  * License version 2 only, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
  28  * However, the following notice accompanied the original version of this
  29  * file:
  30  *
  31  * Written by Doug Lea with assistance from members of JCP JSR-166
  32  * Expert Group and released to the public domain, as explained at
  33  * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
  34  */
  35 
  36 /**
  37  * A small toolkit of classes that support lock-free thread-safe
  38  * programming on single variables.  In essence, the classes in this
  39  * package extend the notion of {@code volatile} values, fields, and
  40  * array elements to those that also provide an atomic conditional update
  41  * operation of the form:
  42  *
  43  *  <pre> {@code boolean compareAndSet(expectedValue, updateValue);}</pre>
  44  *
  45  * <p>This method (which varies in argument types across different
  46  * classes) atomically sets a variable to the {@code updateValue} if it
  47  * currently holds the {@code expectedValue}, reporting {@code true} on
  48  * success.  The classes in this package also contain methods to get and
  49  * unconditionally set values, as well as a weaker conditional atomic
  50  * update operation {@code weakCompareAndSet} described below.
  51  *
  52  * <p>The specifications of these methods enable implementations to
  53  * employ efficient machine-level atomic instructions that are available
  54  * on contemporary processors.  However on some platforms, support may
  55  * entail some form of internal locking.  Thus the methods are not
  56  * strictly guaranteed to be non-blocking --
  57  * a thread may block transiently before performing the operation.
  58  *
  59  * <p>Instances of classes
  60  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicBoolean},
  61  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicInteger},
  62  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLong}, and
  63  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReference}
  64  * each provide access and updates to a single variable of the
  65  * corresponding type.  Each class also provides appropriate utility
  66  * methods for that type.  For example, classes {@code AtomicLong} and
  67  * {@code AtomicInteger} provide atomic increment methods.  One
  68  * application is to generate sequence numbers, as in:
  69  *
  70  *  <pre> {@code
  71  * class Sequencer {
  72  *   private final AtomicLong sequenceNumber
  73  *     = new AtomicLong(0);
  74  *   public long next() {
  75  *     return sequenceNumber.getAndIncrement();
  76  *   }
  77  * }}</pre>
  78  *
  79  * <p>It is straightforward to define new utility functions that, like
  80  * {@code getAndIncrement}, apply a function to a value atomically.
  81  * For example, given some transformation
  82  * <pre> {@code long transform(long input)}</pre>
  83  *
  84  * write your utility method as follows:
  85  *  <pre> {@code
  86  * long getAndTransform(AtomicLong var) {
  87  *   long prev, next;
  88  *   do {
  89  *     prev = var.get();
  90  *     next = transform(prev);
  91  *   } while (!var.compareAndSet(prev, next));
  92  *   return prev; // return next; for transformAndGet
  93  * }}</pre>
  94  *
  95  * <p>The memory effects for accesses and updates of atomics generally
  96  * follow the rules for volatiles, as stated in
  97  * <a href="http://docs.oracle.com/javase/specs/jls/se7/html/jls-17.html#jls-17.4">
  98  * The Java Language Specification (17.4 Memory Model)</a>:
  99  *
 100  * <ul>
 101  *
 102  *   <li> {@code get} has the memory effects of reading a
 103  * {@code volatile} variable.
 104  *
 105  *   <li> {@code set} has the memory effects of writing (assigning) a
 106  * {@code volatile} variable.
 107  *
 108  *   <li> {@code lazySet} has the memory effects of writing (assigning)
 109  *   a {@code volatile} variable except that it permits reorderings with
 110  *   subsequent (but not previous) memory actions that do not themselves
 111  *   impose reordering constraints with ordinary non-{@code volatile}
 112  *   writes.  Among other usage contexts, {@code lazySet} may apply when
 113  *   nulling out, for the sake of garbage collection, a reference that is
 114  *   never accessed again.
 115  *
 116  *   <li>{@code weakCompareAndSet} atomically reads and conditionally
 117  *   writes a variable but does <em>not</em>
 118  *   create any happens-before orderings, so provides no guarantees
 119  *   with respect to previous or subsequent reads and writes of any
 120  *   variables other than the target of the {@code weakCompareAndSet}.
 121  *
 122  *   <li> {@code compareAndSet}
 123  *   and all other read-and-update operations such as {@code getAndIncrement}
 124  *   have the memory effects of both reading and
 125  *   writing {@code volatile} variables.
 126  * </ul>
 127  *
 128  * <p>In addition to classes representing single values, this package
 129  * contains <em>Updater</em> classes that can be used to obtain
 130  * {@code compareAndSet} operations on any selected {@code volatile}
 131  * field of any selected class.
 132  *
 133  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater},
 134  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater}, and
 135  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongFieldUpdater} are
 136  * reflection-based utilities that provide access to the associated
 137  * field types.  These are mainly of use in atomic data structures in
 138  * which several {@code volatile} fields of the same node (for
 139  * example, the links of a tree node) are independently subject to
 140  * atomic updates.  These classes enable greater flexibility in how
 141  * and when to use atomic updates, at the expense of more awkward
 142  * reflection-based setup, less convenient usage, and weaker
 143  * guarantees.
 144  *
 145  * <p>The
 146  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerArray},
 147  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicLongArray}, and
 148  * {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceArray} classes
 149  * further extend atomic operation support to arrays of these types.
 150  * These classes are also notable in providing {@code volatile} access
 151  * semantics for their array elements, which is not supported for
 152  * ordinary arrays.
 153  *
 154  * <p id="weakCompareAndSet">The atomic classes also support method
 155  * {@code weakCompareAndSet}, which has limited applicability.  On some
 156  * platforms, the weak version may be more efficient than {@code
 157  * compareAndSet} in the normal case, but differs in that any given
 158  * invocation of the {@code weakCompareAndSet} method may return {@code
 159  * false} <em>spuriously</em> (that is, for no apparent reason).  A
 160  * {@code false} return means only that the operation may be retried if
 161  * desired, relying on the guarantee that repeated invocation when the
 162  * variable holds {@code expectedValue} and no other thread is also
 163  * attempting to set the variable will eventually succeed.  (Such
 164  * spurious failures may for example be due to memory contention effects
 165  * that are unrelated to whether the expected and current values are
 166  * equal.)  Additionally {@code weakCompareAndSet} does not provide
 167  * ordering guarantees that are usually needed for synchronization
 168  * control.  However, the method may be useful for updating counters and
 169  * statistics when such updates are unrelated to the other
 170  * happens-before orderings of a program.  When a thread sees an update
 171  * to an atomic variable caused by a {@code weakCompareAndSet}, it does
 172  * not necessarily see updates to any <em>other</em> variables that
 173  * occurred before the {@code weakCompareAndSet}.  This may be
 174  * acceptable when, for example, updating performance statistics, but
 175  * rarely otherwise.
 176  *
 177  * <p>The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicMarkableReference}
 178  * class associates a single boolean with a reference.  For example, this
 179  * bit might be used inside a data structure to mean that the object
 180  * being referenced has logically been deleted.
 181  *
 182  * The {@link java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicStampedReference}
 183  * class associates an integer value with a reference.  This may be
 184  * used for example, to represent version numbers corresponding to
 185  * series of updates.
 186  *
 187  * <p>Atomic classes are designed primarily as building blocks for
 188  * implementing non-blocking data structures and related infrastructure
 189  * classes.  The {@code compareAndSet} method is not a general
 190  * replacement for locking.  It applies only when critical updates for an
 191  * object are confined to a <em>single</em> variable.
 192  *
 193  * <p>Atomic classes are not general purpose replacements for
 194  * {@code java.lang.Integer} and related classes.  They do <em>not</em>
 195  * define methods such as {@code equals}, {@code hashCode} and
 196  * {@code compareTo}.  (Because atomic variables are expected to be
 197  * mutated, they are poor choices for hash table keys.)  Additionally,
 198  * classes are provided only for those types that are commonly useful in
 199  * intended applications.  For example, there is no atomic class for
 200  * representing {@code byte}.  In those infrequent cases where you would
 201  * like to do so, you can use an {@code AtomicInteger} to hold
 202  * {@code byte} values, and cast appropriately.
 203  *
 204  * You can also hold floats using
 205  * {@link java.lang.Float#floatToRawIntBits} and
 206  * {@link java.lang.Float#intBitsToFloat} conversions, and doubles using
 207  * {@link java.lang.Double#doubleToRawLongBits} and
 208  * {@link java.lang.Double#longBitsToDouble} conversions.
 209  *
 210  * @since 1.5
 211  */
 212 package java.util.concurrent.atomic;