--- /dev/null	2017-02-08 09:46:36.598049496 -0800
+++ new/test/java/lang/annotation/TestConstructorParameterAnnotations.java	2017-05-19 14:03:57.800500394 -0700
@@ -0,0 +1,252 @@
+/*
+ * Copyright (c) 2017, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
+ * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
+ *
+ * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
+ * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ *
+ * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
+ * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
+ * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License
+ * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
+ * accompanied this code).
+ *
+ * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
+ * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
+ * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
+ *
+ * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
+ * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
+ * questions.
+ */
+
+/*
+ * @test
+ * @bug     8074977
+ * @summary Test consistency of annotations on constructor parameters
+ * @compile             TestConstructorParameterAnnotations.java
+ * @run main            TestConstructorParameterAnnotations
+ * @compile -parameters TestConstructorParameterAnnotations.java
+ * @run main            TestConstructorParameterAnnotations
+ */
+
+import java.lang.annotation.*;
+import java.lang.reflect.*;
+import java.util.*;
+
+/*
+ * Some constructor parameters are <em>mandated</em>; that is, they
+ * are not explicitly present in the source code, but required to be
+ * present by the Java Language Specification. In other cases, some
+ * constructor parameters are not present in the source, but are
+ * synthesized by the compiler as an implementation artifact. There is
+ * not a reliable mechanism to consistently determine whether or not
+ * a parameter is implicit or not.
+ *
+ * (Using the "-parameters" option to javac does emit the information
+ * needed to make a reliably determination, but the information is not
+ * present by default.)
+ *
+ * The lack of such a mechanism causes complications reading parameter
+ * annotations in some cases since annotations for parameters are
+ * written out for the parameters in the source code, but when reading
+ * annotations at runtime all the parameters, including implicit ones,
+ * are present.
+ */
+public class TestConstructorParameterAnnotations {
+    public static void main(String... args) {
+        int errors = 0;
+        Class<?>[] classes = {NestedClass0.class,
+                              NestedClass1.class,
+                              NestedClass2.class,
+                              NestedClass3.class,
+                              NestedClass4.class,
+                              StaticNestedClass0.class,
+                              StaticNestedClass1.class,
+                              StaticNestedClass2.class, 
+                              StaticNestedClass3.class,
+                              StaticNestedClass4.class};
+
+        for (Class<?> clazz : classes) {
+            for (Constructor<?> ctor : clazz.getConstructors()) {
+                System.out.println(ctor);
+                errors += checkGetParameterAnnotations(clazz, ctor);
+                errors += checkGetParametersGetAnnotation(clazz, ctor);
+            }
+        }
+
+        if (errors > 0)
+            throw new RuntimeException(errors + " errors.");
+        return;
+    }
+
+    private static int checkGetParameterAnnotations(Class<?> clazz,
+                                                    Constructor<?> ctor) {
+        String annotationString =
+            Arrays.deepToString(ctor.getParameterAnnotations());
+        String expectedString =
+            clazz.getAnnotation(ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations.class).value();
+        
+        if (!Objects.equals(annotationString, expectedString)) {
+            System.err.println("Annotation mismatch on " + ctor +
+                               "\n\tExpected:" + expectedString +
+                               "\n\tActual:  " + annotationString);
+            return 1;
+        }
+        return 0;
+    }
+
+    private static int checkGetParametersGetAnnotation(Class<?> clazz,
+                                                       Constructor<?> ctor) {
+        int errors = 0;
+        int i = 0;
+        ExpectedParameterAnnotations epa =
+            clazz.getAnnotation(ExpectedParameterAnnotations.class);
+
+        for (Parameter param : ctor.getParameters() ) {
+            String annotationString =
+                Objects.toString(param.getAnnotation(MarkerAnnotation.class));
+            String expectedString = epa.value()[i];
+
+            if (!Objects.equals(annotationString, expectedString)) {
+                System.err.println("Annotation mismatch on " + ctor +
+                                   " on param " + param +
+                                   "\n\tExpected:" + expectedString +
+                                   "\n\tActual:  " + annotationString);
+                errors++;
+            }
+            i++;
+        }
+        return errors;
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations("[[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({"null"})
+    public class NestedClass0 {
+        public NestedClass0() {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[], " +
+        "[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=1)]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "null",
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=1)"})
+    public class NestedClass1 {
+        public NestedClass1(@MarkerAnnotation(1) int parameter) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[], " +
+        "[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=2)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "null",
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=2)",
+        "null"})
+    public class NestedClass2 {
+        public NestedClass2(@MarkerAnnotation(2) int parameter1,
+                            int parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[], " +
+        "[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=3)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "null",
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=3)",
+            "null"})
+    public class NestedClass3 {
+        public <P> NestedClass3(@MarkerAnnotation(3) P parameter1,
+                                int parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[], " +
+        "[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=4)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "null",
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=4)",
+        "null"})
+    public class NestedClass4 {
+        public <P, Q> NestedClass4(@MarkerAnnotation(4) P parameter1,
+                                   Q parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations("[]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({"null"})
+    public static class StaticNestedClass0 {
+        public StaticNestedClass0() {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=1)]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=1)"})
+    public static class StaticNestedClass1 {
+        public StaticNestedClass1(@MarkerAnnotation(1) int parameter) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=2)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=2)",
+        "null"})
+    public static class StaticNestedClass2 {
+        public StaticNestedClass2(@MarkerAnnotation(2) int parameter1,
+                            int parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=3)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=3)",
+        "null"})
+    public static class StaticNestedClass3 {
+        public <P> StaticNestedClass3(@MarkerAnnotation(3) P parameter1,
+                                      int parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations(
+        "[[@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=4)], " +
+        "[]]")
+    @ExpectedParameterAnnotations({
+        "@TestConstructorParameterAnnotations$MarkerAnnotation(value=4)",
+        "null"})
+    public static class StaticNestedClass4 {
+        public <P, Q> StaticNestedClass4(@MarkerAnnotation(4) P parameter1,
+                                         Q parameter2) {}
+    }
+
+    @Target(ElementType.PARAMETER)
+    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+    @interface MarkerAnnotation {
+        int value();
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * String form of expected value of calling
+     * getParameterAnnotations on a constructor.
+     */
+    @Target(ElementType.TYPE)
+    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+    @interface ExpectedGetParameterAnnotations {
+        String value();
+    }
+
+    /**
+     * String form of expected value of calling
+     * getAnnotation(MarkerAnnotation.class) on each element of the
+     * result of getParameters() on a constructor.
+     */
+    @Target(ElementType.TYPE)
+    @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
+    @interface ExpectedParameterAnnotations {
+        String[] value();
+    }
+}