--- old/src/hotspot/share/services/threadService.cpp	2019-11-04 14:59:08.000000000 -0500
+++ new/src/hotspot/share/services/threadService.cpp	2019-11-04 14:59:08.000000000 -0500
@@ -208,7 +208,8 @@
   assert(thread != NULL, "should be non-NULL");
   debug_only(Thread::check_for_dangling_thread_pointer(thread);)
 
-  ObjectMonitor *wait_obj = thread->current_waiting_monitor();
+  ObjectMonitorHandle omh;
+  ObjectMonitor *wait_obj = thread->current_waiting_monitor(&omh);
 
   oop obj = NULL;
   if (wait_obj != NULL) {
@@ -216,7 +217,8 @@
     obj = (oop) wait_obj->object();
     assert(obj != NULL, "Object.wait() should have an object");
   } else {
-    ObjectMonitor *enter_obj = thread->current_pending_monitor();
+    ObjectMonitorHandle omh;
+    ObjectMonitor *enter_obj = thread->current_pending_monitor(&omh);
     if (enter_obj != NULL) {
       // thread is trying to enter() an ObjectMonitor.
       obj = (oop) enter_obj->object();
@@ -362,6 +364,7 @@
 
   // This code was modified from the original Threads::find_deadlocks code.
   int globalDfn = 0, thisDfn;
+  ObjectMonitorHandle omh;
   ObjectMonitor* waitingToLockMonitor = NULL;
   JvmtiRawMonitor* waitingToLockRawMonitor = NULL;
   oop waitingToLockBlocker = NULL;
@@ -391,10 +394,15 @@
 
     cycle->reset();
 
+    if (waitingToLockMonitor != NULL) {
+      // Done with the current waitingToLockMonitor value so release
+      // the ObjectMonitorHandle manually before we use it again:
+      omh.unset_om_ptr();
+    }
     // When there is a deadlock, all the monitors involved in the dependency
     // cycle must be contended and heavyweight. So we only care about the
     // heavyweight monitor a thread is waiting to lock.
-    waitingToLockMonitor = jt->current_pending_monitor();
+    waitingToLockMonitor = jt->current_pending_monitor(&omh);
     // JVM TI raw monitors can also be involved in deadlocks, and we can be
     // waiting to lock both a raw monitor and ObjectMonitor at the same time.
     // It isn't clear how to make deadlock detection work correctly if that
@@ -485,7 +493,12 @@
         break;
       }
       previousThread = currentThread;
-      waitingToLockMonitor = (ObjectMonitor*)currentThread->current_pending_monitor();
+      if (waitingToLockMonitor != NULL) {
+        // Done with the current waitingToLockMonitor value so release
+        // the ObjectMonitorHandle manually before we use it again:
+        omh.unset_om_ptr();
+      }
+      waitingToLockMonitor = (ObjectMonitor*)currentThread->current_pending_monitor(&omh);
       if (concurrent_locks) {
         waitingToLockBlocker = currentThread->current_park_blocker();
       }
@@ -967,13 +980,13 @@
   st->print("=============================");
 
   JavaThread* currentThread;
-  ObjectMonitor* waitingToLockMonitor;
   JvmtiRawMonitor* waitingToLockRawMonitor;
   oop waitingToLockBlocker;
   int len = _threads->length();
   for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
     currentThread = _threads->at(i);
-    waitingToLockMonitor = currentThread->current_pending_monitor();
+    ObjectMonitorHandle omh;
+    ObjectMonitor* waitingToLockMonitor = currentThread->current_pending_monitor(&omh);
     waitingToLockRawMonitor = currentThread->current_pending_raw_monitor();
     waitingToLockBlocker = currentThread->current_park_blocker();
     st->cr();