test/compiler/rtm/cli/TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig.java
Print this page
@@ -56,46 +56,70 @@
= CommandLineOptionTest.getExperimentalOptionErrorMessage(
"UseRTMForStackLocks");
String warningMessage
= RTMGenericCommandLineOptionTest.RTM_FOR_STACK_LOCKS_WARNING;
+ String shouldFailMessage = " VM option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' is "
+ + "experimental%nJVM startup should fail without "
+ + "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions flag";
+
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(
- new String[] { errorMessage }, null, ExitCode.FAIL,
+ new String[] { errorMessage }, null, shouldFailMessage,
+ shouldFailMessage + "%nError message expected", ExitCode.FAIL,
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks");
+ String shouldPassMessage = " VM option 'UseRTMForStackLocks'"
+ + " is experimental%nJVM startup should pass with "
+ + "-XX:+UnlockExperimentalVMOptions flag";
// verify that we get a warning when trying to use rtm for stack
// lock, but not using rtm locking.
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(
- new String[] { warningMessage }, null, ExitCode.OK,
+ new String[] { warningMessage }, null, shouldPassMessage,
+ "There should be warning when trying to use rtm for stack "
+ + "lock, but not using rtm locking", ExitCode.OK,
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks",
"-XX:-UseRTMLocking");
// verify that we don't get a warning when no using rtm for stack
// lock and not using rtm locking.
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(null,
- new String[] { warningMessage }, ExitCode.OK,
+ new String[] { warningMessage }, shouldPassMessage,
+ "There should not be any warning when use both "
+ + "-XX:-UseRTMForStackLocks and -XX:-UseRTMLocking "
+ + "flags",
+ ExitCode.OK,
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
"-XX:-UseRTMForStackLocks",
"-XX:-UseRTMLocking");
// verify that we don't get a warning when using rtm for stack
// lock and using rtm locking.
CommandLineOptionTest.verifySameJVMStartup(null,
- new String[] { warningMessage }, ExitCode.OK,
+ new String[] { warningMessage }, shouldPassMessage,
+ "There should not be any warning when use both "
+ + "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks and -XX:+UseRTMLocking"
+ + " flags",
+ ExitCode.OK,
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
"-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks",
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking");
// verify that default value if false
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig.DEFAULT_VALUE,
+ "Default value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should be false",
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS);
// verify that default value is false even with +UseRTMLocking
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig.DEFAULT_VALUE,
+ "Default value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should be false",
CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking");
// verify that we can turn the option on
CommandLineOptionTest.verifyOptionValueForSameVM("UseRTMForStackLocks",
- "true", CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
+ "true", "Value of option 'UseRTMForStackLocks' should "
+ + "be able to be set as 'true' when both "
+ + "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks and "
+ + "-XX:+UseRTMLocking flags used",
+ CommandLineOptionTest.UNLOCK_EXPERIMENTAL_VM_OPTIONS,
"-XX:+UseRTMLocking", "-XX:+UseRTMForStackLocks");
}
public static void main(String args[]) throws Throwable {
new TestUseRTMForStackLocksOptionOnSupportedConfig().test();