< prev index next >

src/java.base/share/classes/sun/security/provider/certpath/IndexedCollectionCertStore.java

Print this page
rev 51977 : [mq]: 8200381-Typos-in-javadoc-missing-verb-be-and-alike

*** 1,7 **** /* ! * Copyright (c) 2002, 2012, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this --- 1,7 ---- /* ! * Copyright (c) 2002, 2018, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this
*** 47,57 **** * attributes, in particular for large Collections (reduction from linear * time to effectively constant time). Searches for non-indexed queries * are as fast (or marginally faster) than for the standard * CollectionCertStore. Certificate subjects and CRL issuers * were found to be specified in most searches used internally by the ! * CertPath provider. Additional attributes could indexed if there are * queries that justify the effort. * * <li>Changes to the specified Collection after construction time are * not detected and ignored. This is because there is no way to efficiently * detect if a Collection has been modified, a full traversal would be --- 47,57 ---- * attributes, in particular for large Collections (reduction from linear * time to effectively constant time). Searches for non-indexed queries * are as fast (or marginally faster) than for the standard * CollectionCertStore. Certificate subjects and CRL issuers * were found to be specified in most searches used internally by the ! * CertPath provider. Additional attributes could be indexed if there are * queries that justify the effort. * * <li>Changes to the specified Collection after construction time are * not detected and ignored. This is because there is no way to efficiently * detect if a Collection has been modified, a full traversal would be
< prev index next >