< prev index next >
src/share/vm/gc_implementation/g1/concurrentMark.inline.hpp
Print this page
rev 7322 : 8076265: Simplify deal_with_reference
Summary: Eliminate _CHECK_BOTH_FINGERS_ and simplify.
Reviewed-by: brutisso, tschatzl
*** 257,274 ****
_local_max_size = tmp_size;
}
++_local_pushes );
}
! // This determines whether the method below will check both the local
! // and global fingers when determining whether to push on the stack a
! // gray object (value 1) or whether it will only check the global one
! // (value 0). The tradeoffs are that the former will be a bit more
! // accurate and possibly push less on the stack, but it might also be
! // a little bit slower.
!
! #define _CHECK_BOTH_FINGERS_ 1
inline void CMTask::deal_with_reference(oop obj) {
if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] we're dealing with reference = "PTR_FORMAT,
_worker_id, p2i((void*) obj));
--- 257,295 ----
_local_max_size = tmp_size;
}
++_local_pushes );
}
! inline bool CMTask::is_below_finger(HeapWord* objAddr,
! HeapWord* global_finger) const {
! // If objAddr is above the global finger, then the mark bitmap scan
! // will find it later, and no push is needed. Similarly, if we have
! // a current region and objAddr is between the local finger and the
! // end of the current region, then no push is needed. The tradeoff
! // of checking both vs only checking the global finger is that the
! // local check will be more accurate and so result in fewer pushes,
! // but may also be a little slower.
! if (_finger != NULL) {
! // We have a current region.
!
! // Finger and region values are all NULL or all non-NULL. We
! // use _finger to check since we immediately use its value.
! assert(_curr_region != NULL, "invariant");
! assert(_region_limit != NULL, "invariant");
! assert(_region_limit <= global_finger, "invariant");
!
! // True if objAddr is less than the local finger, or is between
! // the region limit and the global finger.
! if (objAddr < _finger) {
! return true;
! } else if (objAddr < _region_limit) {
! return false;
! } // Else check global finger.
! }
! // Check global finger.
! return objAddr < global_finger;
! }
inline void CMTask::deal_with_reference(oop obj) {
if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] we're dealing with reference = "PTR_FORMAT,
_worker_id, p2i((void*) obj));
*** 295,348 ****
if (_cm->par_mark_and_count(obj, hr, _marked_bytes_array, _card_bm)) {
// No OrderAccess:store_load() is needed. It is implicit in the
// CAS done in CMBitMap::parMark() call in the routine above.
HeapWord* global_finger = _cm->finger();
! #if _CHECK_BOTH_FINGERS_
! // we will check both the local and global fingers
!
! if (_finger != NULL && objAddr < _finger) {
! if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
! gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] below the local finger ("PTR_FORMAT"), "
! "pushing it", _worker_id, p2i(_finger));
! }
! push(obj);
! } else if (_curr_region != NULL && objAddr < _region_limit) {
! // do nothing
! } else if (objAddr < global_finger) {
// Notice that the global finger might be moving forward
// concurrently. This is not a problem. In the worst case, we
// mark the object while it is above the global finger and, by
// the time we read the global finger, it has moved forward
! // passed this object. In this case, the object will probably
// be visited when a task is scanning the region and will also
// be pushed on the stack. So, some duplicate work, but no
// correctness problems.
!
! if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
! gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] below the global finger "
! "("PTR_FORMAT"), pushing it",
! _worker_id, p2i(global_finger));
! }
! push(obj);
! } else {
! // do nothing
! }
! #else // _CHECK_BOTH_FINGERS_
! // we will only check the global finger
!
! if (objAddr < global_finger) {
! // see long comment above
!
if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
! gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] below the global finger "
! "("PTR_FORMAT"), pushing it",
! _worker_id, p2i(global_finger));
}
push(obj);
}
- #endif // _CHECK_BOTH_FINGERS_
}
}
}
}
}
--- 316,348 ----
if (_cm->par_mark_and_count(obj, hr, _marked_bytes_array, _card_bm)) {
// No OrderAccess:store_load() is needed. It is implicit in the
// CAS done in CMBitMap::parMark() call in the routine above.
HeapWord* global_finger = _cm->finger();
! // We only need to push a newly grey object on the mark
! // stack if it is in a section of memory the mark bitmap
! // scan has already examined. Mark bitmap scanning
! // maintains progress "fingers" for determining that.
! //
// Notice that the global finger might be moving forward
// concurrently. This is not a problem. In the worst case, we
// mark the object while it is above the global finger and, by
// the time we read the global finger, it has moved forward
! // past this object. In this case, the object will probably
// be visited when a task is scanning the region and will also
// be pushed on the stack. So, some duplicate work, but no
// correctness problems.
! if (is_below_finger(objAddr, global_finger)) {
if (_cm->verbose_high()) {
! gclog_or_tty->print_cr("[%u] below a finger (local: " PTR_FORMAT
! ", global: " PTR_FORMAT ") pushing "
! PTR_FORMAT " on mark stack",
! _worker_id, p2i(_finger),
! p2i(global_finger), p2i(objAddr));
}
push(obj);
}
}
}
}
}
}
< prev index next >