--- old/src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_64.ad	Thu May 20 16:56:55 2010
+++ new/src/cpu/x86/vm/x86_64.ad	Thu May 20 16:56:55 2010
@@ -2054,6 +2054,11 @@
 // into registers?  True for Intel but false for most RISCs
 const bool Matcher::clone_shift_expressions = true;
 
+bool Matcher::narrow_oop_use_complex_address() {
+  assert(UseCompressedOops, "only for comressed oops code");
+  return (LogMinObjAlignmentInBytes <= 3);
+}
+
 // Is it better to copy float constants, or load them directly from
 // memory?  Intel can load a float constant from a direct address,
 // requiring no extra registers.  Most RISCs will have to materialize