/* * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. * * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code. * * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that * accompanied this code). * * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. * * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any * questions. */ /* * This file is available under and governed by the GNU General Public * License version 2 only, as published by the Free Software Foundation. * However, the following notice accompanied the original version of this * file: * * Written by Doug Lea, Bill Scherer, and Michael Scott with * assistance from members of JCP JSR-166 Expert Group and released to * the public domain, as explained at * http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ */ package java.util.concurrent; import java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles; import java.lang.invoke.VarHandle; import java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport; /** * A synchronization point at which threads can pair and swap elements * within pairs. Each thread presents some object on entry to the * {@link #exchange exchange} method, matches with a partner thread, * and receives its partner's object on return. An Exchanger may be * viewed as a bidirectional form of a {@link SynchronousQueue}. * Exchangers may be useful in applications such as genetic algorithms * and pipeline designs. * *

Sample Usage: * Here are the highlights of a class that uses an {@code Exchanger} * to swap buffers between threads so that the thread filling the * buffer gets a freshly emptied one when it needs it, handing off the * filled one to the thread emptying the buffer. *

 {@code
 * class FillAndEmpty {
 *   Exchanger exchanger = new Exchanger<>();
 *   DataBuffer initialEmptyBuffer = ... a made-up type
 *   DataBuffer initialFullBuffer = ...
 *
 *   class FillingLoop implements Runnable {
 *     public void run() {
 *       DataBuffer currentBuffer = initialEmptyBuffer;
 *       try {
 *         while (currentBuffer != null) {
 *           addToBuffer(currentBuffer);
 *           if (currentBuffer.isFull())
 *             currentBuffer = exchanger.exchange(currentBuffer);
 *         }
 *       } catch (InterruptedException ex) { ... handle ... }
 *     }
 *   }
 *
 *   class EmptyingLoop implements Runnable {
 *     public void run() {
 *       DataBuffer currentBuffer = initialFullBuffer;
 *       try {
 *         while (currentBuffer != null) {
 *           takeFromBuffer(currentBuffer);
 *           if (currentBuffer.isEmpty())
 *             currentBuffer = exchanger.exchange(currentBuffer);
 *         }
 *       } catch (InterruptedException ex) { ... handle ...}
 *     }
 *   }
 *
 *   void start() {
 *     new Thread(new FillingLoop()).start();
 *     new Thread(new EmptyingLoop()).start();
 *   }
 * }}
* *

Memory consistency effects: For each pair of threads that * successfully exchange objects via an {@code Exchanger}, actions * prior to the {@code exchange()} in each thread * happen-before * those subsequent to a return from the corresponding {@code exchange()} * in the other thread. * * @since 1.5 * @author Doug Lea and Bill Scherer and Michael Scott * @param The type of objects that may be exchanged */ public class Exchanger { /* * Overview: The core algorithm is, for an exchange "slot", * and a participant (caller) with an item: * * for (;;) { * if (slot is empty) { // offer * place item in a Node; * if (can CAS slot from empty to node) { * wait for release; * return matching item in node; * } * } * else if (can CAS slot from node to empty) { // release * get the item in node; * set matching item in node; * release waiting thread; * } * // else retry on CAS failure * } * * This is among the simplest forms of a "dual data structure" -- * see Scott and Scherer's DISC 04 paper and * http://www.cs.rochester.edu/research/synchronization/pseudocode/duals.html * * This works great in principle. But in practice, like many * algorithms centered on atomic updates to a single location, it * scales horribly when there are more than a few participants * using the same Exchanger. So the implementation instead uses a * form of elimination arena, that spreads out this contention by * arranging that some threads typically use different slots, * while still ensuring that eventually, any two parties will be * able to exchange items. That is, we cannot completely partition * across threads, but instead give threads arena indices that * will on average grow under contention and shrink under lack of * contention. We approach this by defining the Nodes that we need * anyway as ThreadLocals, and include in them per-thread index * and related bookkeeping state. (We can safely reuse per-thread * nodes rather than creating them fresh each time because slots * alternate between pointing to a node vs null, so cannot * encounter ABA problems. However, we do need some care in * resetting them between uses.) * * Implementing an effective arena requires allocating a bunch of * space, so we only do so upon detecting contention (except on * uniprocessors, where they wouldn't help, so aren't used). * Otherwise, exchanges use the single-slot slotExchange method. * On contention, not only must the slots be in different * locations, but the locations must not encounter memory * contention due to being on the same cache line (or more * generally, the same coherence unit). Because, as of this * writing, there is no way to determine cacheline size, we define * a value that is enough for common platforms. Additionally, * extra care elsewhere is taken to avoid other false/unintended * sharing and to enhance locality, including adding padding (via * @Contended) to Nodes, embedding "bound" as an Exchanger field. * * The arena starts out with only one used slot. We expand the * effective arena size by tracking collisions; i.e., failed CASes * while trying to exchange. By nature of the above algorithm, the * only kinds of collision that reliably indicate contention are * when two attempted releases collide -- one of two attempted * offers can legitimately fail to CAS without indicating * contention by more than one other thread. (Note: it is possible * but not worthwhile to more precisely detect contention by * reading slot values after CAS failures.) When a thread has * collided at each slot within the current arena bound, it tries * to expand the arena size by one. We track collisions within * bounds by using a version (sequence) number on the "bound" * field, and conservatively reset collision counts when a * participant notices that bound has been updated (in either * direction). * * The effective arena size is reduced (when there is more than * one slot) by giving up on waiting after a while and trying to * decrement the arena size on expiration. The value of "a while" * is an empirical matter. We implement by piggybacking on the * use of spin->yield->block that is essential for reasonable * waiting performance anyway -- in a busy exchanger, offers are * usually almost immediately released, in which case context * switching on multiprocessors is extremely slow/wasteful. Arena * waits just omit the blocking part, and instead cancel. The spin * count is empirically chosen to be a value that avoids blocking * 99% of the time under maximum sustained exchange rates on a * range of test machines. Spins and yields entail some limited * randomness (using a cheap xorshift) to avoid regular patterns * that can induce unproductive grow/shrink cycles. (Using a * pseudorandom also helps regularize spin cycle duration by * making branches unpredictable.) Also, during an offer, a * waiter can "know" that it will be released when its slot has * changed, but cannot yet proceed until match is set. In the * mean time it cannot cancel the offer, so instead spins/yields. * Note: It is possible to avoid this secondary check by changing * the linearization point to be a CAS of the match field (as done * in one case in the Scott & Scherer DISC paper), which also * increases asynchrony a bit, at the expense of poorer collision * detection and inability to always reuse per-thread nodes. So * the current scheme is typically a better tradeoff. * * On collisions, indices traverse the arena cyclically in reverse * order, restarting at the maximum index (which will tend to be * sparsest) when bounds change. (On expirations, indices instead * are halved until reaching 0.) It is possible (and has been * tried) to use randomized, prime-value-stepped, or double-hash * style traversal instead of simple cyclic traversal to reduce * bunching. But empirically, whatever benefits these may have * don't overcome their added overhead: We are managing operations * that occur very quickly unless there is sustained contention, * so simpler/faster control policies work better than more * accurate but slower ones. * * Because we use expiration for arena size control, we cannot * throw TimeoutExceptions in the timed version of the public * exchange method until the arena size has shrunken to zero (or * the arena isn't enabled). This may delay response to timeout * but is still within spec. * * Essentially all of the implementation is in methods * slotExchange and arenaExchange. These have similar overall * structure, but differ in too many details to combine. The * slotExchange method uses the single Exchanger field "slot" * rather than arena array elements. However, it still needs * minimal collision detection to trigger arena construction. * (The messiest part is making sure interrupt status and * InterruptedExceptions come out right during transitions when * both methods may be called. This is done by using null return * as a sentinel to recheck interrupt status.) * * As is too common in this sort of code, methods are monolithic * because most of the logic relies on reads of fields that are * maintained as local variables so can't be nicely factored -- * mainly, here, bulky spin->yield->block/cancel code. Note that * field Node.item is not declared as volatile even though it is * read by releasing threads, because they only do so after CAS * operations that must precede access, and all uses by the owning * thread are otherwise acceptably ordered by other operations. * (Because the actual points of atomicity are slot CASes, it * would also be legal for the write to Node.match in a release to * be weaker than a full volatile write. However, this is not done * because it could allow further postponement of the write, * delaying progress.) */ /** * The index distance (as a shift value) between any two used slots * in the arena, spacing them out to avoid false sharing. */ private static final int ASHIFT = 5; /** * The maximum supported arena index. The maximum allocatable * arena size is MMASK + 1. Must be a power of two minus one, less * than (1<<(31-ASHIFT)). The cap of 255 (0xff) more than suffices * for the expected scaling limits of the main algorithms. */ private static final int MMASK = 0xff; /** * Unit for sequence/version bits of bound field. Each successful * change to the bound also adds SEQ. */ private static final int SEQ = MMASK + 1; /** The number of CPUs, for sizing and spin control */ private static final int NCPU = Runtime.getRuntime().availableProcessors(); /** * The maximum slot index of the arena: The number of slots that * can in principle hold all threads without contention, or at * most the maximum indexable value. */ static final int FULL = (NCPU >= (MMASK << 1)) ? MMASK : NCPU >>> 1; /** * The bound for spins while waiting for a match. The actual * number of iterations will on average be about twice this value * due to randomization. Note: Spinning is disabled when NCPU==1. */ private static final int SPINS = 1 << 10; /** * Value representing null arguments/returns from public * methods. Needed because the API originally didn't disallow null * arguments, which it should have. */ private static final Object NULL_ITEM = new Object(); /** * Sentinel value returned by internal exchange methods upon * timeout, to avoid need for separate timed versions of these * methods. */ private static final Object TIMED_OUT = new Object(); /** * Nodes hold partially exchanged data, plus other per-thread * bookkeeping. Padded via @Contended to reduce memory contention. */ @jdk.internal.vm.annotation.Contended static final class Node { int index; // Arena index int bound; // Last recorded value of Exchanger.bound int collides; // Number of CAS failures at current bound int hash; // Pseudo-random for spins Object item; // This thread's current item volatile Object match; // Item provided by releasing thread volatile Thread parked; // Set to this thread when parked, else null } /** The corresponding thread local class */ static final class Participant extends ThreadLocal { public Node initialValue() { return new Node(); } } /** * Per-thread state. */ private final Participant participant; /** * Elimination array; null until enabled (within slotExchange). * Element accesses use emulation of volatile gets and CAS. */ private volatile Node[] arena; /** * Slot used until contention detected. */ private volatile Node slot; /** * The index of the largest valid arena position, OR'ed with SEQ * number in high bits, incremented on each update. The initial * update from 0 to SEQ is used to ensure that the arena array is * constructed only once. */ private volatile int bound; /** * Exchange function when arenas enabled. See above for explanation. * * @param item the (non-null) item to exchange * @param timed true if the wait is timed * @param ns if timed, the maximum wait time, else 0L * @return the other thread's item; or null if interrupted; or * TIMED_OUT if timed and timed out */ private final Object arenaExchange(Object item, boolean timed, long ns) { Node[] a = arena; int alen = a.length; Node p = participant.get(); for (int i = p.index;;) { // access slot at i int b, m, c; int j = (i << ASHIFT) + ((1 << ASHIFT) - 1); if (j < 0 || j >= alen) j = alen - 1; Node q = (Node)AA.getAcquire(a, j); if (q != null && AA.compareAndSet(a, j, q, null)) { Object v = q.item; // release q.match = item; Thread w = q.parked; if (w != null) LockSupport.unpark(w); return v; } else if (i <= (m = (b = bound) & MMASK) && q == null) { p.item = item; // offer if (AA.compareAndSet(a, j, null, p)) { long end = (timed && m == 0) ? System.nanoTime() + ns : 0L; Thread t = Thread.currentThread(); // wait for (int h = p.hash, spins = SPINS;;) { Object v = p.match; if (v != null) { MATCH.setRelease(p, null); p.item = null; // clear for next use p.hash = h; return v; } else if (spins > 0) { h ^= h << 1; h ^= h >>> 3; h ^= h << 10; // xorshift if (h == 0) // initialize hash h = SPINS | (int)t.getId(); else if (h < 0 && // approx 50% true (--spins & ((SPINS >>> 1) - 1)) == 0) Thread.yield(); // two yields per wait } else if (AA.getAcquire(a, j) != p) spins = SPINS; // releaser hasn't set match yet else if (!t.isInterrupted() && m == 0 && (!timed || (ns = end - System.nanoTime()) > 0L)) { p.parked = t; // minimize window if (AA.getAcquire(a, j) == p) { if (ns == 0L) LockSupport.park(this); else LockSupport.parkNanos(this, ns); } p.parked = null; } else if (AA.getAcquire(a, j) == p && AA.compareAndSet(a, j, p, null)) { if (m != 0) // try to shrink BOUND.compareAndSet(this, b, b + SEQ - 1); p.item = null; p.hash = h; i = p.index >>>= 1; // descend if (Thread.interrupted()) return null; if (timed && m == 0 && ns <= 0L) return TIMED_OUT; break; // expired; restart } } } else p.item = null; // clear offer } else { if (p.bound != b) { // stale; reset p.bound = b; p.collides = 0; i = (i != m || m == 0) ? m : m - 1; } else if ((c = p.collides) < m || m == FULL || !BOUND.compareAndSet(this, b, b + SEQ + 1)) { p.collides = c + 1; i = (i == 0) ? m : i - 1; // cyclically traverse } else i = m + 1; // grow p.index = i; } } } /** * Exchange function used until arenas enabled. See above for explanation. * * @param item the item to exchange * @param timed true if the wait is timed * @param ns if timed, the maximum wait time, else 0L * @return the other thread's item; or null if either the arena * was enabled or the thread was interrupted before completion; or * TIMED_OUT if timed and timed out */ private final Object slotExchange(Object item, boolean timed, long ns) { Node p = participant.get(); Thread t = Thread.currentThread(); if (t.isInterrupted()) // preserve interrupt status so caller can recheck return null; for (Node q;;) { if ((q = slot) != null) { if (SLOT.compareAndSet(this, q, null)) { Object v = q.item; q.match = item; Thread w = q.parked; if (w != null) LockSupport.unpark(w); return v; } // create arena on contention, but continue until slot null if (NCPU > 1 && bound == 0 && BOUND.compareAndSet(this, 0, SEQ)) arena = new Node[(FULL + 2) << ASHIFT]; } else if (arena != null) return null; // caller must reroute to arenaExchange else { p.item = item; if (SLOT.compareAndSet(this, null, p)) break; p.item = null; } } // await release int h = p.hash; long end = timed ? System.nanoTime() + ns : 0L; int spins = (NCPU > 1) ? SPINS : 1; Object v; while ((v = p.match) == null) { if (spins > 0) { h ^= h << 1; h ^= h >>> 3; h ^= h << 10; if (h == 0) h = SPINS | (int)t.getId(); else if (h < 0 && (--spins & ((SPINS >>> 1) - 1)) == 0) Thread.yield(); } else if (slot != p) spins = SPINS; else if (!t.isInterrupted() && arena == null && (!timed || (ns = end - System.nanoTime()) > 0L)) { p.parked = t; if (slot == p) { if (ns == 0L) LockSupport.park(this); else LockSupport.parkNanos(this, ns); } p.parked = null; } else if (SLOT.compareAndSet(this, p, null)) { v = timed && ns <= 0L && !t.isInterrupted() ? TIMED_OUT : null; break; } } MATCH.setRelease(p, null); p.item = null; p.hash = h; return v; } /** * Creates a new Exchanger. */ public Exchanger() { participant = new Participant(); } /** * Waits for another thread to arrive at this exchange point (unless * the current thread is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted}), * and then transfers the given object to it, receiving its object * in return. * *

If another thread is already waiting at the exchange point then * it is resumed for thread scheduling purposes and receives the object * passed in by the current thread. The current thread returns immediately, * receiving the object passed to the exchange by that other thread. * *

If no other thread is already waiting at the exchange then the * current thread is disabled for thread scheduling purposes and lies * dormant until one of two things happens: *

*

If the current thread: *

* then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the current thread's * interrupted status is cleared. * * @param x the object to exchange * @return the object provided by the other thread * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread was * interrupted while waiting */ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public V exchange(V x) throws InterruptedException { Object v; Node[] a; Object item = (x == null) ? NULL_ITEM : x; // translate null args if (((a = arena) != null || (v = slotExchange(item, false, 0L)) == null) && ((Thread.interrupted() || // disambiguates null return (v = arenaExchange(item, false, 0L)) == null))) throw new InterruptedException(); return (v == NULL_ITEM) ? null : (V)v; } /** * Waits for another thread to arrive at this exchange point (unless * the current thread is {@linkplain Thread#interrupt interrupted} or * the specified waiting time elapses), and then transfers the given * object to it, receiving its object in return. * *

If another thread is already waiting at the exchange point then * it is resumed for thread scheduling purposes and receives the object * passed in by the current thread. The current thread returns immediately, * receiving the object passed to the exchange by that other thread. * *

If no other thread is already waiting at the exchange then the * current thread is disabled for thread scheduling purposes and lies * dormant until one of three things happens: *

*

If the current thread: *

* then {@link InterruptedException} is thrown and the current thread's * interrupted status is cleared. * *

If the specified waiting time elapses then {@link * TimeoutException} is thrown. If the time is less than or equal * to zero, the method will not wait at all. * * @param x the object to exchange * @param timeout the maximum time to wait * @param unit the time unit of the {@code timeout} argument * @return the object provided by the other thread * @throws InterruptedException if the current thread was * interrupted while waiting * @throws TimeoutException if the specified waiting time elapses * before another thread enters the exchange */ @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") public V exchange(V x, long timeout, TimeUnit unit) throws InterruptedException, TimeoutException { Object v; Object item = (x == null) ? NULL_ITEM : x; long ns = unit.toNanos(timeout); if ((arena != null || (v = slotExchange(item, true, ns)) == null) && ((Thread.interrupted() || (v = arenaExchange(item, true, ns)) == null))) throw new InterruptedException(); if (v == TIMED_OUT) throw new TimeoutException(); return (v == NULL_ITEM) ? null : (V)v; } // VarHandle mechanics private static final VarHandle BOUND; private static final VarHandle SLOT; private static final VarHandle MATCH; private static final VarHandle AA; static { try { MethodHandles.Lookup l = MethodHandles.lookup(); BOUND = l.findVarHandle(Exchanger.class, "bound", int.class); SLOT = l.findVarHandle(Exchanger.class, "slot", Node.class); MATCH = l.findVarHandle(Node.class, "match", Object.class); AA = MethodHandles.arrayElementVarHandle(Node[].class); } catch (ReflectiveOperationException e) { throw new ExceptionInInitializerError(e); } } }