test/jdk/valhalla/valuetypes/Reflection.java

rev 55117 : 8223350: [lworld] Use inline classes instead of value classes

@@ -22,11 +22,11 @@
  */
 
 
 /*
  * @test
- * @summary test reflection on value types
+ * @summary test reflection on inline types
  * @compile -XDallowWithFieldOperator Point.java Line.java NonFlattenValue.java
  * @run main/othervm -XX:+EnableValhalla Reflection
  */
 
 import java.lang.reflect.*;

@@ -73,11 +73,11 @@
     private final Constructor<?> ctor;
     private final Object o;
     Reflection(Class<?> type, String cn, Object o) throws Exception {
         this.c = Class.forName(cn);
         if (!c.isValue() || c != type) {
-            throw new RuntimeException(cn + " is not a value class");
+            throw new RuntimeException(cn + " is not an inline class");
         }
 
         // the box type is the primary mirror
         assertEquals(type, o.getClass());
         assertEquals(type, c.asBoxType());

@@ -131,11 +131,11 @@
     }
 
     void newInstance() throws Exception {
         try {
             Object o = c.newInstance();
-            throw new RuntimeException("newInstance expected to be unsupported on value class");
+            throw new RuntimeException("newInstance expected to be unsupported on inline class");
         } catch (IllegalAccessException e) {}
     }
 
     void constructor() throws Exception {
         try {