< prev index next >

src/share/vm/gc/g1/g1CollectorPolicy.cpp

Print this page
rev 9422 : 8143251: HeapRetentionTest.java Test is failing on jdk9/dev
Reviewed-by:
rev 9423 : [mq]: 8143251-user-requested-cm-rev1


1630   // We are about to decide on whether this pause will be an
1631   // initial-mark pause.
1632 
1633   // First, collector_state()->during_initial_mark_pause() should not be already set. We
1634   // will set it here if we have to. However, it should be cleared by
1635   // the end of the pause (it's only set for the duration of an
1636   // initial-mark pause).
1637   assert(!collector_state()->during_initial_mark_pause(), "pre-condition");
1638 
1639   if (collector_state()->initiate_conc_mark_if_possible()) {
1640     // We had noticed on a previous pause that the heap occupancy has
1641     // gone over the initiating threshold and we should start a
1642     // concurrent marking cycle. So we might initiate one.
1643 
1644     if (!about_to_start_mixed_phase() && collector_state()->gcs_are_young()) {
1645       // Initiate a new initial mark if there is no marking or reclamation going on.
1646       initiate_conc_mark();
1647       ergo_verbose0(ErgoConcCycles,
1648                     "initiate concurrent cycle",
1649                     ergo_format_reason("concurrent cycle initiation requested"));
1650     } else if (_g1->user_requested_concurrent_full_gc(_g1->gc_cause())) {
1651       // Initiate a user requested initial mark and update the collector state to
1652       // reflect this.
1653       collector_state()->set_gcs_are_young(true);
1654       collector_state()->set_last_young_gc(false);
1655 
1656       initiate_conc_mark();
1657       ergo_verbose0(ErgoConcCycles,
1658                     "initiate concurrent cycle",
1659                     ergo_format_reason("user requested concurrent cycle"));
1660     } else {
1661       // The concurrent marking thread is still finishing up the
1662       // previous cycle. If we start one right now the two cycles
1663       // overlap. In particular, the concurrent marking thread might
1664       // be in the process of clearing the next marking bitmap (which
1665       // we will use for the next cycle if we start one). Starting a
1666       // cycle now will be bad given that parts of the marking
1667       // information might get cleared by the marking thread. And we
1668       // cannot wait for the marking thread to finish the cycle as it
1669       // periodically yields while clearing the next marking bitmap
1670       // and, if it's in a yield point, it's waiting for us to
1671       // finish. So, at this point we will not start a cycle and we'll
1672       // let the concurrent marking thread complete the last one.




1630   // We are about to decide on whether this pause will be an
1631   // initial-mark pause.
1632 
1633   // First, collector_state()->during_initial_mark_pause() should not be already set. We
1634   // will set it here if we have to. However, it should be cleared by
1635   // the end of the pause (it's only set for the duration of an
1636   // initial-mark pause).
1637   assert(!collector_state()->during_initial_mark_pause(), "pre-condition");
1638 
1639   if (collector_state()->initiate_conc_mark_if_possible()) {
1640     // We had noticed on a previous pause that the heap occupancy has
1641     // gone over the initiating threshold and we should start a
1642     // concurrent marking cycle. So we might initiate one.
1643 
1644     if (!about_to_start_mixed_phase() && collector_state()->gcs_are_young()) {
1645       // Initiate a new initial mark if there is no marking or reclamation going on.
1646       initiate_conc_mark();
1647       ergo_verbose0(ErgoConcCycles,
1648                     "initiate concurrent cycle",
1649                     ergo_format_reason("concurrent cycle initiation requested"));
1650     } else if (_g1->is_user_requested_concurrent_full_gc(_g1->gc_cause())) {
1651       // Initiate a user requested initial mark. An initial mark must be young only
1652       // GC, so the collector state must be updated to reflect this.
1653       collector_state()->set_gcs_are_young(true);
1654       collector_state()->set_last_young_gc(false);
1655 
1656       initiate_conc_mark();
1657       ergo_verbose0(ErgoConcCycles,
1658                     "initiate concurrent cycle",
1659                     ergo_format_reason("user requested concurrent cycle"));
1660     } else {
1661       // The concurrent marking thread is still finishing up the
1662       // previous cycle. If we start one right now the two cycles
1663       // overlap. In particular, the concurrent marking thread might
1664       // be in the process of clearing the next marking bitmap (which
1665       // we will use for the next cycle if we start one). Starting a
1666       // cycle now will be bad given that parts of the marking
1667       // information might get cleared by the marking thread. And we
1668       // cannot wait for the marking thread to finish the cycle as it
1669       // periodically yields while clearing the next marking bitmap
1670       // and, if it's in a yield point, it's waiting for us to
1671       // finish. So, at this point we will not start a cycle and we'll
1672       // let the concurrent marking thread complete the last one.


< prev index next >